Learn math the easy way


Hurlock's Study: Praise verses Criticism

Research studies can be intellectual,
academic, difficult to understand, andLook at the accompanying graph to see the
sometimes even irrelevant to our specificscores of the four groups. It's startling,
application. But there are other studies thatisn't it? Wouldn't you think that the results
can be very insightful and help us understandof this study should be standard reading for
how better to do our job. There is one suchevery schoolteacher in America? Sounds like
study that I would like to discuss in thisit, doesn't it? But there is just one
month's column. The information is so timelyproblem. Dr. Hurlock's study was conducted in
and connected to managing others that I think1925, that's eighty years ago! Unfortunately,
we all need to read and think about what thethe study wasn't seen as important in 1925,
researchers discovered. The unique part ofand, therefore, hasn't changed much behavior
this study is that the researchers were notin the classroom since. But the results are
studying adults, but rather children. I knowso convincing that I would like to draw a
this may sound strange to you; however, whatparallel to managing adults with praise,
we learn from the study can be directlycriticism or indifference.Some managers
related to managing adults. So don't getbelieve that giving positive reinforcement to
caught up thinking this study doesn't relateemployees is an indication of managerial
to your job because the subjects wereweakness. So in an attempt to appear strong
children.In this case the people studied wereand in command of the situation, they become
fourth and fifth grade students and themasters of inflicting emotional pain through
situation was how they performed in a mathcriticism, sarcasm or indifference. Those
class. The variables introduced by thethree tactics are called the Three Pillars of
researchers were the type of feedback theContempt, because the most common reaction to
students received after they took mathbeing subjected to them is to feel contempt
exercises and quizzes.Dr. Elizabeth Hurlocktoward the perpetrator.With an effective
wanted to know what reactions there would bemanagement development program, school
when fourth and fifth grade students receivedteachers and business leaders can discover
different types of feedback on their maththat reinforcing positive performance with
performance. She specifically wanted to knowsupportive feedback is far better than
if it was more effective to praise,creating a contemptuous atmosphere with
criticize, or ignore students' performance insarcasm, criticism or indifference. Like many
math. And she wanted to know what wouldthings in managing others, how your employees
happen when students were subjected to eachperceive you is what really counts. Your
of those conditions. The outcome was to beintentions are nice and noteworthy, but they
decided by how many math problems eachare actually irrelevant. As every psychology
student had solved 2, 3, 4, and 5 days afterstudent learns, "perception is reality." And
receiving the different types of feedback.Forbecause it is reality we must be concerned
her study Dr. Hurlock divided the studentswith how we come across to others; in other
into four groups. In the first group studentswords, how others see our behaviors is more
were identified by name and praised in frontimportant that our intentions. To do
of other students for their good performance.otherwise is to be foolish and ineffective.As
Students in the second group were alsoa manager you need to be aware of the power
identified by name in front of otherof positive feedback along with the dangers
students, but they were criticized for theirof trying to motivate others or change
poor performance. Students in the third groupbehavior with the use of criticism, sarcasm
were completely ignored, although they wereor indifference. Positive reinforcement has
in the classroom to hear the other studentsbeen proved by Hurlock's study and many other
being praised or criticized. A fourth orstudies to be the best method of getting your
control group was moved to another room afterpoint across to others. It is unfortunate
the first test. Students in this group tookthat so many managers haven't been convinced
the same tests, but they received no commentsof that fact. Watch your own style of giving
on their performance whatsoever.Now, here isfeedback for the next few weeks. Monitor how
what Dr. Hurlock learned. Students in themuch you offer praise as supportive feedback
groups that were praised or criticizedverses how often you lapse into the Pillars
performed better after the first day. Thenof Contempt. The first step in improvement is
their performance changed dramatically. Thealways awareness. Increase your awareness and
students who were criticized showed athen work to modify your style.Dr. Richard L.
significant decline in their test scores, andWilliams is a business consultant
by days 3 and 4, they were performing equallyspecializing in performance coaching, quality
with students in the group that had beenimprovement, team development, leadership
completely ignored.By contrast, the studentsdevelopment and organizational development
who were praised experienced a majordiagnostics.To learn more about management
improvement after the second day that wasdevelopment programs that can help empower
sustained through the end of the study. Byyour people through effective communication,
the fifth day of the study, the group thatplease contact a CMOE representative at
received praise showed much better888-262-2499.
performance  than  the  other  groups.



1 A B C D 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106